Tuesday, October 25, 2016

Shrimp Tank Flourishing

This is just a short report.

My 10G shrimp tank is flourishing, expecially since I installed a MicMol G1 Aqua Air 20W Planted Tank lighting strip, which was surprisingly affordable at $69.99.

First, I'll let the picture speak:

10G with LED lighting & lucky bamboo
The longer these lucky bamboo are in there, the better they seem to do, they are doing amazingly well. My plants are doing so well that I am harvesting them all the time and giving them away to other aquarists, and to the local pet store. In the interim the colony of RCS (Red Cherry Shrimp) is growing steadily, and they are becoming one of my favorite animals to keep, even though in the picture here you'd barely notice them - you have to be up close to catch them in a picture.  Here's a nice write up on Red Cherry Shrimp on Aquariadise. I started with about 15 of them in the summer, added in three batches over a period of two months. Presently I probably have about 70, and I am told that this size tank will sustain 100-150. To really enjoy them, you have to get close and just watch their activities for a while, but I can stare at them for hours.

As you can see the plants are thriving too, and there are no algae problems, between the shrimp and the snails that is totally under control.


Saturday, September 17, 2016

Third time, three aquaria in two years...

If you want a planted tank, in an attempt to create a natural environment in your aquarium, you will encounter an argument in the hobby about whether or not to do a hi-tech tank, with intense lighting and CO2 injection. I don't believe there is an argument in reality, it's all a matter of what you like, and what trade-offs you like.

A "natural" aquarium is an aquarium proper

To make it simple: in a natural tank, you will be limited to "easy" plants, that are not too fussy about low levels of CO2 uptake, and also emergent plants are good, because they can take up CO2 from the air (and produce Oxygen under water). In a hi-tech tank with CO2-injection, you can achieve a greater variety of plants, including species that require more intense lighting, and those which need the extra CO2, because otherwise they would be out-competed by other plants.

When I grew up, I had the books of Dutch authors Heijmans and Thijsse, which advocated aquaria as a way to study the life in your local waters on a smaller scale, and the emphasis was very much "ecological" in nature: understanding the natural system, and the interactions of plants and fish, and all other water critters. There is a site inspired by this tradition, The Egological Aquarium.

Since I've been living in the US, I was always amazed to hear this referred to as the Dutch Aquarium, but in a further, more cultured evolution, it has also been popularized as simply the natural aquarium, and one of the big names is the Japanese Aquarist Takashi Amano. And there have been interesting contributions from Germany, including by a company called Dupla, and these days from Dennerle. These days Diana Walstad and Matt Owens are the proponents of this more natural way of keeping an aquarium, in which re-creating a natural balance on a small scale is the central focus.

Even Diana Walstad, who currently is one of the leading proponents of natural aquariums in the US, is not against "tech" per se, but her preference is trying to establish a balance between plants and fish with minimal help. She will however use an internal filter for water flow, and strongly recommends UV sterilization - which in my view isn't "not natural" because in nature waters are getting UV irradiation from the sun. She evidently does not like the high-lighting and CO2 injection, which in my view could be argued the same way to be as natural as anything else about an aquarium. In short, it's all in the eyes of the beholder.
What does matter is the distinction: between a fish tank and an aquarium.

  • A fish tank is a tank with water for the purpose of displaying fish, and usually kept under control by artificial means, without regard to the natural environment, including chemical filtration, etc. Mostly, that's what the pet stores cater to these days.
  • An aquarium proper is an effort to recreate a "natural" environment on a small scale. Studying the ecological processes becomes the central focus, including the interactions between plants and fish, filtration (mostly mechanical and biological, not chemical), lighting, CO2, UV. The focus becomes on life processes, water parameters, and the food chain. It can be "low tech," but not necessarily, it will seek to approximate natural conditions, and strive for biological balance.

The Walstad Method

For some documentation on the Walstad method, begin with her book: Diana Walstad - The Ecology of the Planted Aquarium

Next, listen to these interviews with Diana:
Next, here is even more about the Walstad Method
Beyond that, it's all about common sense and observation.

Matt Owens and the food chain

Matt Owens in his book An alternative aquarium: A robust habitat focuses as much on the overall ecological equilibrium between plants and fish, but adds a strong focus on the food chain, and recommends that you start your own refugium to in effect breed live food for your main aquariums.

Two years on: Third Time Aquarist has Three Aquaiums

Between all this reading, since I restarted my hobby two years ago with a single 5 gallon tank with a betta, and since then it has grown into a collection of three aquariums:

  • My original 5 gallon Aqueon Cue, since all pimped out with better lighting, and a ATI sponge filter. Now it serves as a refugium to grow inverts for food in my main tank, many are barely visible, but the tubifex come out in droves when you feed them wilted lettuce (that's also the way to catch them), and the scuds (gammarus) are very observable. Here are the species included:
    • Tubifex (note that by being in a refugium without fish, they cannot carry fish pathogens)
    • Gammarus
    • Copepods 
    • Daphnia
    • Planaria
    • Rotifers
    • Ostracods
  • My main. 29 gallon tank
  • And a 10 gallon shrimp tank, which also houses other inverts.
Here are some recent pictures:

5 Gallon Aqueon Cue - invert refugium, with Dracaena

10G Shrimp tank with Dracaena growing out


10 G Shrimp tank with Dracaena
Main tank, 29G, neons, rasboras, aneas cories, pygmy cories, otocinclus, amanos, MTS 



Saturday, August 6, 2016

Of Plants, pH, CO2, Nitrates, and Water Quality

Starting up my new 29 Gallon tank has been the slowest setup I've ever done, in part because I became really focused on learning as much as I  could about water quality in the process. And plants definitely came before fish, to the ludicrous extreme that for too long already my plants have been starved of nitrogen: my nitrate readings have been zero for months now. I almost "had" to add more fish to introduce some pollution, because the fish wastes are food for the plants - so I'll be back to watching the water parameters like a hawk. This week I added three Otocinclus catfish and a school of a dozen Neon Tetras, which by accident included a single Lambchop Rasbora, which is a very interesting critter, with hilarious consequences...

About that lone Lambchop Rasbora

OK, so that lone Lambchop Rasbora was included by accident. What are you gonna do? Just watch what happens next...
Initially, it seemed as if he was just falling in line with the school of Neons. But then, after a few hours, a hilarious pattern emerged: the Rasbora falls in with the school for a while and then wanders off on his own - after all, he's a breed apart. So he explores the tank on his own, that is... until he sees a Neon that became separated from the school, and like a shepherd dog, he starts chasing him, and he continues to chase the Neons until the school is together again, and then for a while he swims with the school, until he is satisfied, and the pattern repeats itself. It will be very interesting to watch if this continues.

For now, I do not want to add more fish until I have a firm handle on the changes in water quality again, though considering my heavy plant growth, I think the new fish will barely move the needle on nitrates, but I also think it will take one or two months before I can tell for sure. I am continuing to take my time to find the right balance between fish and plants.

Hanna Instruments pH tester


Then it was time to turn to the mysteries of pH, that all important parameter, or so it seems. By the way, many smart pros in the field warn against an obsessive focus on pH, other parameters are at least equally important. As per usual, the some of the best source of information are the sections on water quality on the American Aquarium Products site:  Nitrogen Cycle, Redox Potential, and Carbonate Hardness (KH) - the point being that if you lose sight of the KH parameter, you are asking for pH instability.

Like most aquarists, I had forever been using the API water test kits for everything, including pH. Amazingly, I had been involved in some technology pertaining to drinking water, and had a set of electronic testers for that reason. Originally, I had kept them at my office, but when I brought them home, I forgot about them until recently, as I became deeply interested in aquarium water quality. My Hanna Instruments ORP and TDS meters were still in good working order, but my pH probe proved unreliable (they had all been purchased in 1999). Quite an amazing outcome, actually. I bought a new Hanna pH probe through American Aquarium Products (Hanna InstrumentsChecker (R) Plus pH Tester - HI98100). It has +/- 0.2 pH accuracy, and automatic calibration. After carefully calibrating it, I began to find that the API pH test (with the drops, I already did not like the strips...) is reasonably unreliable, but the greater accuracy of the HI98100 is worth it, because it provides a more precise and unambiguous reading. I am not saying the API test is unreliable, but it can be harder to read, however, you must be aware that the PH tester needs to be calibrated regularly, and for aquarium work the only calibration that matters is with the pH 7.0 reference liquid. You should do the calibration every time if you only use the pH probe irregularly, but then of course if you have multiple tanks that's still more convenient, and more accurate. If you test daily, Hanna recommends calibrating the tester once or twice a week. Sometimes I do have episode where I'm testing the water daily.

With three tanks, already the convenience of the electronic tester is a significant time saver, and the extra accuracy is a bonus, but I will be monitoring very carefully how all various measurements validate and reinforce my newly accurate pH readings, and to be sure I will periodically recalibrate my pH Checker, but I am sold on this product for any serious aquarist.   

Hydor CO2 kit

A good reference chart on KH and pH is the one on Think Fish, here. The bottom line is, for good CO2 levels in a typical freshwater tank, your KH should be between 3.5 and 10 dH, or between 50 and 200 ppm, which reinforces what I said above about not focusing on a single parameter. Now depending on the level of lighting, you may need some CO2 injection, for the plants otherwise may not get sufficient CO2.
In my quest for CO2 on a budget, I scooped up a Hydor CO2 Green NRG Advanced kit, which I would not recommend, because it is discontinued by the manufacturer. I only found that out after I bought it. If you can still find it, they're usually cheap, but you're buying a dead-end product, for which you can get no support. I should have checked the Hydor site first, and I would have realized that the product was orphaned, but... hindsight is always 20/20.

Having said that, for doing CO2 on a budget, the thing actually works sort of OK. I am quite a Hydor fan, so I can only hope some day they would come out with a new and improved version of this design. So far, the main problem I found with it is that it takes some effort to adjust it right, and the valve does tend to drift, so you need to check your bubbles once in a while. You can find a host of YouTube videos on this piece of equipment, such as this one, it's a nifty design, but don't mount it vertically like this video shows... it will work better horizontally, as shown here.

Besides the adjustment problem I've experienced, the fact is that it does not have a solenoid valve, which in and of itself would cost nearly as much as what I've paid for the whole system. I did put it on a timer however, so at night the CO2 (12 bubbles per minute), just bubbles up and escapes, whereas during the day the diffuser runs and that works really well, so the CO2 is really absorbed into the water very well. It is a nifty system that uses a little motor, similar to Hydor's Bubble Maker, for oxygenating your tank. Again, since it has been out of production for 8 years already, you cannot get any replacement parts for it any more, and it is only a matter of time until I will have to get a serious CO2 system. Economics also plays into it, for even on my 29 Gallon tank, I am now going through on 74g CO2 cartridge in 4-6 weeks, and they cost $10 each, where as a five pound CO2 tank would probably last a year or more on such a small tank, particularly with a solenoid valve, so it would be shut off at night, and a single charge costs me $20 around where I live.

CO2 wish list

I've been speccing CO2 systems for a while, and my guess is that my next move would be the Complete Ultimate CO2 System form Aquariumplants.com, here. That system truly looks awesome. The truth is a completely automated CO2 system is the way to go, especially for a larger tank with serious plants. Number one, by shutting it off at night, besides saving some CO2, you are reducing the risk of over supplying CO2, which is not good for the occupants. Your plants exhale CO2 at night, while they inhale CO2 by day. I used to have such a system when I ran a 125 Gallon tank for nearly 20 years, and it was quite the thing, to be able to simply regulate your pH automatically with such a system, rather than counting bubbles, as you have to do with any system that you need to regulate manually. (I do it once a week with my Hydor system, to make sure...)

Conclusion

Once you get serious about plants, you have the low-tech way, in which you balance fish and plant population, because fish waste is plant food. Diana Walstad is the big proponent of that model currently, but it is a very traditional approach, and all my earliest tanks in my childhood days were based on that principle. You should see this review by Dustin, and this interview with Diana Walstad by Aquarimax. 
If you are open to go hi-tech, with lots of lighting and CO2 injection, you may be able to get by with a manually regulated CO2 system in smaller tanks, and there are numerous options on the market. Generally speaking, the cheaper they are, the more work they require. Once you get into larger tanks, an automated CO2 system with a pH-probe that controls the CO2 diffusion is the way to go. At that level the idea that CO2 injection is extra work no longer applies. It will actually reduce the work, though you will have to trim your plants more often.


Saturday, June 18, 2016

Seeking Enlightenment about Lighting

The first time I got serious about lighting, in the 1980's, I had a 125 Gallon aquarium in my living room, and I had twin 175 Watt Metal Halide lights suspended from the ceiling, I had a Dupla CO2 system that was completely automated (controlling the pH at 6.8), a wet/dry filter and a large Eheim Canister filter. I had done everything in that tank so that, with an automatic feeder in place I could travel for two weeks and never worry about the tank. The tank was heavily planted with jungle val along the back wall, and a big piece of driftwood in the middle, and plants everywhere. Still, I was not as much on top of water quality as I am today. Which is not to say I don't make mistakes. I do. Yet, I stay focused on just learning as much as I can about what is going on with water chemistry, and the ecological balance between plants and fish.

Lighting a 29G tank: 30" x 18" x 12" - deep!

Lighting is key, that much is clear, but I am a long way from being totally clear about lighting. I did come to the conclusion very quickly that the traditional hood that came with my main 29G tank was not enough, and besides switching the fluorescent to a Hagen Flora-glo, I also added a Marineland "hidden" LED, and I actually run a 3Watt LED floodlight as well (Deep Blue Solar Flare 3W). now I am in observer mode as to how the plants are doing. Generally speaking they do fairly well, and I'm not going too crazy with ferts, but typically once a week I add some Excell, some Iron, and some Potassium, and maybe a little flourish. With that regime and fairly easy plants the results have been fairly good, but I want to do some experimentation to see what works better.

To begin with I'll be adding a Hydor CO2 Green NRG Advanced, It is a discontinued product, and they are being sold out... the reviews are mixed, but to me it seemed worth a try because I've taken a liking to Hydor products. Time will tell how well this works out. Online I can get 74G CO2 canisters for $20 for 2, so that should probably last me for a year. Worth a try. And if it does not work out, I'll have to get a serious CO2 system... the reason to mention it here is the better your lighting, the more your plants need CO2 to sustain growth.

So, back to the lights. Some of the best sources of information about lighting are:


 Here is the configuration of my 29G tank:
  • Main hood: Hagen Flora-Glo, 20W, 2,800K, 650 Lumen, or 32.5 Lumen/Watt
  • Additional: Marineland Hidden LED 21",  6,500K (72x .06W white LEDs, and 16x .06W 460 nm blue LEDs), PAR/Lux at 12" 25/1121, and at 24" 11/377 
  • Spot light, Deep Blue Solarflare 3W Micro LED 6,700K
29Gallon tank as of June 20th, 2016
As an alternative for the main tube, I also have a Hagen Life-Glo tube, which is 6,700K, and I may try to alternate those two for like 2 months at a clip, to see if I can tell the difference. It definitely has a much higher light output, at 1,470 Lumen, or 73.5 Lumen/Watt.

In the end I suspect I may get hunches, but you'd have to engage serious light meters to tell the difference. Most importantly, with the above combo I have barely a hint of algae, certainly not to any problematic levels. I may wipe the glass clean with an algae sponge once a month. Note that I do have Duck Weed and Hornwort, which are surface (Duck Weed), or floating (Tropical Hornwort), plants that tend to filter the light.

As I'm still struggling to understand all the parameters, and have precious few means to monitor them exactly, let me try to put some order to the mess:

  1. Color "temperature," this is important as it relates to the absorption of light by the plants. Notable that the higher K lights (14,000K & higher) penetrate deeper, but may cause too much algae, and therefore should usually be avoided in planted tanks. You might however be able to combine a 2,700K light with a 6,700, or even a 18,000K light.
    1. 2,700-2,800 Kelvin is usually known as 'warm white,' and it's sort of the temperature of an incandenscent bulb. It seems to be decent for plants, hence Hagen's "Flora-Glo" is 2,800K.
    2. 6,500-6,700 K is the color temperature of the sun at high noon, and offers the greatest depth penetration, and in general seems to do well with plants, note that this is the color of Hagen's Life-Glo and also of the little spot light I have in my tank.
  2. The Nanometer range (note that the yellow and green is not well absorbed by plants, which is why we see those colors so well). Note that many lights will display on the package what range they put out:
    1. 400-420 nm: Violet
    2. 420-440 nm: Indigo
    3. 440-490 nm: Blue
    4. 490-570 nm: Green
    5. 570-585 nm: Yellow
    6. 585-620 nm: Orange
    7. 620-780 nm: Red.
  3. Lumen the quantity of light, and LUX is light intensity, one LUX being one Lumen per square meter.
  4. PAR stands for Photosynthetically Active Radiation, and generally the range of 400-700 nm, which is the part of the light spectrum that is most helpful to plant life. You need a special meter to  measure PAR, called a Quantum Light Meter.
  5. RQE, PAS & PUR - Quality of Light, Useful Light Energy.
    1. PUR (Photosynthetically Useful Radiation).
    2. PAS (Photosynthetic Action Spectrum).
    3. RQE (Relative Quantum Efficiency) indicates the efficiency of photosynthesis.
  6. Watt equals one joule of energy per second. People used to talk about watts per gallon, but the term has lost all meaning because of today's lighting options.
  7. CRI (Color Rendering Index) has to do with the appearance of the colors, and a normal incandescent bulb has a CRI of 100.
  8. UV - Ultra-Violet Light - has little to do with the issue of plant growth etc., but everything with the health of aquarium water. As per usual, my favorite source of information is this article on UV-C Sterilization on the AAP website. Do you need UV? Apart from all of the technical discussions, note that in nature, water would receive plenty of UV radiation from the sun, and there is the fact that UV-radiation tends to lower ORP of the water, which should make the water healthier. In short, there are a lot of common sense reasons to consider UV as part of your lighting solution. 
Hopefully the above helps as a guide to much about the discussion of light, and in general, you want to be aware of the fact that the typical old aquarium hoods are often under powered for serious plant growing. In the model above I've used such an old-line hood with a high quality fluorescent tube, and added some extra LED lighting, and, judging by the results sofar, this is a workable compromise. What remains to be seen if it is sufficient light once I start up my CO2.

The alternatives all involve throwing out the old hood, and using an open top and using really serious hi-tech lighting. Nowadays LEDs is pretty much the way to go.
  • American Aquarium Products offers a great selection, here.
  • Aquarium Plants also offers an impressive collection, here.
  • And you can always find critiques on the various forums, and youtube.

A 10 Gallon tank

For my 10 Gallon tank I've used the existing hood as well, with a good quality bulb, and I've added another of the Marineland hidden LEDs, in this case a 17" model, and plants are thriving, so that combo seems to be effective.

Five Gallon nano-tank

For my five gallon tank I am running an 18W NemoLicht Aqua Fresh, at about 50% of capacity by day, and at the lowest setting by night. Sofar, this light has proven to be a good value, with its built-in controller, and a moonlight setting.

Conclusion

Obviously, you can search for yourself, but if you want to grow plants, I would advise you to study the advice from people who specialize on plants, for many of the popular, cheap lights, especially LEDs, will let you down if you want to grow serious plants. In most cases the complete tank setups will also be inadequate, unless you are really sure they come with light suitable for plant growing.

To be continued...





Sunday, May 22, 2016

New Tank experiment - Ten Gallon Setup ctd. - Subtrate

In my earlier report on my new 10G tank I laid out the overall program. Today I want to focus on the substrate and the first inverts.

Here's what I did for substrate, it is more elaborate than need be, and I would not advise this, as it was dictated in this case mostly by what I happened to have on hand, and I considered that generally it was still in line with what Matt Owens recommends in his book, The Alternative Aquarium, A Robust Habitat.

Note that I had Hydor Hydrokable on the bottom, here's what I did for substrate:

  1. 0.25" of AquariumPlants.com's Aquadert, just enough to cover the heating cable, with a 2" wide bank across the front, and about 1.25" high.
  2. Behind the bank of Aquadert, I provided a layer of organic potting soil with all the course, un-decomposed organics removed, enough to be level with the front.
  3. About 0.75" of Seachem Onyx Sand.
  4. About 0.75 of Seachem Flourite.
Since then I've begun to plant, sofar:
  • Corkscrew Val
  • Micro Swords
  • Hornwort ( the course variety, Ceratophyllum Demersum) - fills about 1/3rd of the tank.
  • Duck Weed.
  • Three Crypt Wendtii
  • Java Moss
  • Micro Val
With the plants starting to catch on, I've also imported some inverts, for now MTS, Tubifex, Daphnia,  and Copepods, maybe some rotifers... hard to tell with the naked eye. Finally, I have added some Red Cherry Shrimp. Now I'm just curious to see how the inverts establish themselves.

In order to accommodate this development, I am going to keep my betta in my 29G tank for now, where he seems to be very happy. Purely watching these inverts catch on, and observing the plants is going to be my preoccupation for now, as far as this tank is concerned. In the long term I want to preserve my 5G tank as a refugium to breed inverts. 

Saturday, May 14, 2016

Of Hornwort and Hornwort

There is usually a lot of confusion about plant identification, and the retail channel is not always careful with its designations. In my case I got Hornwort from two different sources, and one was the course variety, Ceratophyllum Demersum, while the other one was Ceratophyllum Submersum, which is also called Soft Hornwort, or Tropical Hornwort.

After the Duck Weed lessons (see previous post), it is now time for Hornwort (aka Coontail). Clearly, this is not only an easy plant, it will produce copious oxygen in the water, and much like Duck Weed, it will use up a lot of nutrients, for to plants fish waste is food. Lastly, if you have a goodly amount of Hornwort around it will also tend to keep pH from going down (acidification), and it provides endless cover for fry and for inverts of all sorts.

Soft (Tropical) Hornwort (Ceratophyllum Submersum)
Hornwort (Ceratophyllum Demersum)






To a degree Hornwort and Duck Weed are natural companions for the surface cover of Duck Weed reduces air exchange, while Hornwort produces lots of oxygen. Together, these two plants are what you want around when you are starting a tank. They will help stabilize the water immediately, prevent the pH from dropping and absorb nutrients like crazy during the new tank cycle. The beauty of both plants is that they're not rooted, so you can have them even if you have no substrate for rooted plants.

Evidently, these two will also out-compete algae, so you should never have any serious algae outbreak with this combo in your tank. It is important also to realize that the filter and the plants are competing for nutrients, so you don't want to overdo it with the filtration either. Enough is enough. Ideally you should have capacity to spare.
Once my new 10 Gallon tank is completely up and running, and before I introduce serious inverts, I am going to shut down my API SuperClean 5-20 HOB filter, and rely on an ATI Hydro Sponge #1, so that I will have only biological and mechanical filtration, and I'll keep the SuperClean HOB as a spare in case I ever need chemical filtration. From my 29G tank it is clear that, at least with a very low bio load, some MTS, a betta, 8 cories, nitrates decreased to near zero as my plants took off, and now I am watching developments as I am slowly adding some more fish.

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

New Tank experiment - Ten Gallon Setup

Ok, this is going to be my third third-time aquarium, a little Aqueon 10 gallon tank, complete with the hood, that one of my neighbors threw out. I saw they got it at Christmas, for they threw out the box it came in, but by April they must have succeeded in killing all the fish, and they threw it out, so I picked it up, for I wanted to experiment with a different setup, and I believe that 10 gallon is actually the minimum acceptable tank size for a Betta, and after all, this whole experiment was kicked off by a betta fish that came home with me from a dinner two years ago, and he's still doing... swimmingly.

Tank preparation

The thermal insulation backing
Looking down, heating cable installed, and back wall decoration

Frontal view, showing Hydrokable, and the back wall
















New Tank Setup in Steps

Here is the program I am following, again, based on earlier experience, and now following the book by Matt Owens, The Alternative Aquarium, A Robust Habitat. In my 29G setup I had just begun reading this book and then I did an experiment with some potting soil for a Wisteria I planted in a terracotta flower pot. The plant is doing spectacularly well. So this time out, I will follow Owens' program even further and use organic potting soil for the first layer of substrate, with sand on top.

  1. Cleaning/desinfecting the tank.
  2. Installing the thermal back wall and a background.
  3. Installing Hydor Hydrokable 25W under gravel heating cable, and backup heater - 25W is not enough by itself, for it can get cold at night in winter.
  4. Add 1" water and Prodibio Bacter kit Soil, to seed the beneficial bacteria.
  5. About 1- 1.5" of organic potting soil, with all the course matter removed, such as pieces of twigs that are not fully decomposed etc. Actually, I am going to use some Aquadert in front half, and the organic potting soil in the back, for no other reason than that I had some Aquadert left over from my 29G tank installation - and, the taller, deeper rooted plants go in the back.
  6. About 1.5"of sand. I'll use Onyx Sand, with a top layer of Flourite Sand.
  7. Water fill up. Use ZeroWater, below 6 TDS, plus Seachem Replenish, to add the necessary healthy electrolytes.
  8. Tweaking GH & KH, including using AAP Wonder Shell, and Seachem Acid & Alkaline Buffer.
  9. Filtration: at first my SuperClean 5-20 moves over, to be replaced later by an ATI Sponge Filter #1. 
  10. Lighting, using the Aqueon hood, but add the Marineland 17" Hidden LED in front.
  11. Plants.
  12. Snails (MTS), and other inverts.
  13. Fish (Betta and probably a few cories, or some shrimp). Fish won't go in until the invert cultures are thriving, and the cycling of the tank is well under way.

Notes and Updates

I will make notes and updates and any comments as I go through this process. As I am writing this, I am awaiting the arrival of the Prodibio Bacter Kit Soil. Some plants will be imported from the other tanks and also help starting the bacteria, and by running the filter on here that also came from a long established tank, the cycling should go easy. Eventually, I will replace the filter with a Sponge filter, for the SuperClean would suck up too many of the invertebrates. I don't think I'll need that high of a flow rate. Particularly since I now have Duck Weed and Hornwort in all my tanks, nitrates and phosphates are less of a problem than they once were.

Wednesday, May 4, 2016

Duck weed or no duck weed

Traditionally, we were all taught to hate duck weed. It did not belong in the aquarium, supposedly. Recently Matt Owens' book, The Alternative Aquarium: A Robust Habitat changed my mind, and since then I've been studying a Dutch site on ecological aquarium keeping as well. And the more you start researching Duck weed online it gets positively interesting.

Duck weed hoovers up ammonia, nitrites and nitrates, and it oxygenates the water - and then to think people did not use to like this plant. There are many interesting posts and articles to be found:


It makes me wonder, how did I ever get by without it? The general principle seems to be that plants under water do not get but so much CO2, whereas plants that grow out of the water, or in this case, that float on top of the water, can absorb CO2 from the air, and therefore can grow much faster, and in the process absorb the fish wastes, which are nutrients to them.

Besides all of the wonders of sucking up nutrients at a fast rate, there is also the fact that it slows down evaporation, and therefore it is an alternative to a canopy, if you want to have an open tank...

As my new 29 gallon tank matured, and ammonia and nitrite finally went to zero, initially my nitrates were as high as 40 ppm, or even higher, upto 80 ppm at times, but duckweed was well... growing like a weed, and while I recently did a partial water change, I also just harvested some duckweed to see if it will indeed end up lowering the nitrate level, for my tank is fairly thinly populated, with just 5 amano shrimp (I think - though I started with 6...), and 5 pygmy cories. In the end however, with Duck weed (and Hornwort, and other plants), my nitrate reading is typically in the 5-10 PPM range, without water changes.

Here are some recent pictures:
4/28, with Duck Weed cover...

5/4 with the hidden LED to penetrate the cover
and some of the occupants:
5/4 pregnant Amano shrimp walking out of the picture
Ok, so I gave up trying to catch one of them in the picture, but there are three pregnant females... of the original three males I recently can find only two, so maybe one gave up the ghost during my two month tank cycling period, which seemed to go very slow at times.
Be that as it may, they do seem to be thriving, and my five Pygmy Cories, who don't pose well for pictures either, seem to be doing very well also.

The biggest challenge with the Duck Weed has been the lighting, for it not only slows evaporation, it also shields the light.

Duck weed and lighting

I was getting concerned with the weakness of the light, and it seemed evident to me that the plants needed more. 
The lighting has evolved to:
  • Hagen Flora Glo, which has the right color temperature for plant growth (2,700K). but low output (650 lumen/90 LUX). At some point, I may consider replacing this with a Life Glo Bulb, which has higher output (1,470 lumen, at 6,700K).
  • A Deep Blue Micro 3W LED SolarFlare, which gives the Wisteria some needed light. Color temperature is 6,700K daylight. 
  • A Marineland 21"Hidden LED that clamps to the tank frame inside the lid, and penetrates better through the duck weed, being right above the water line. It has 72 LEDs, with Par/Lux at 12" 25/1121 and at 24" 11/377, with 550 lumens, and the color temperature is 6,500K, which is daylight.
This is still not high intensity lighting you would need for serious plant growth, but with fairly regular, low light plants, it will definitely do. All in all it is a modest, but workable solution. The Wisteria is growing by leaps and bounds, and soon I'll be donating plants to the pet store... Two Amazon Swords produced three offshoots, which are catching on. The problem area is the excess shade below the massive Wisteria, so I will have to start pruning, which should help water quality again by stimulating growth... talking about which... the last few days I seem to have stabilized at pH 7.0 and ORP 85, with an rH in the 22-23 range, which should be excellent, except I still have no objective way to measure if there's actually any Hydrogen present in the water, though it might be the case by reason of the Wonder shells, especially because of the Magnesium.


Wednesday, April 13, 2016

Tank Cycling Revisited

Cycling of a new tank is an interesting challenge and just when I thought I was through it, I found out I was not...

The data of the first 62 days

Days Before/After Ammonia Nitrirte Nitrate pH GH KH Phospate FE Chelated FE


UV

Water Change TAN NO2 NO3


PO43−

TDS ORP rH

Startup








142


9 NO WC 0 0 0 6.8 300 35 0





9



7.2








10



6.8
35


475


16
0 0 0 6.8 265 50 0.25





23 Before
0 0 6.8 180 25






24 Before 0.25 0 0 6.4 300 25 0

551


24



7.0








25
0.25 0 0

50






26
0.5 0 0









27
0 0










28
0.25 0










29
0.25 0
7.2








30 Before 0.5 0 0 7.6








30 After 0.5

7.0








31
0.25

7.0
35






32
0.75

7.0








33
1

7.0








34
4 0
6.4








35
4 0
6.6








36
4 0
7.0








37
4 0
6.6
50






37 again… 4 0
7.0 380 50






38
4 0
6.6








39
8 0
7.0








40
4 0
7.0








41
4 0
6.8








42
6 0 0 6.6




510 150 25.20
43
6

7.2
35



125 25.56
44 After 4 0 0 7.0 220 35 0.25 0 0 460 118 24.92
45
4

7.0





125 25.16
46
4

7.0





82 23.70
47 Dark 4 0
7.0





95 24.14
48
4

6.8




470 86 23.44
49
4

7.0





75 23.47
50
4

7.0





100 24.31
51 Before 4 0 5 7.0 340 35 0.25 0 0 512 108 24.58
52 After 4 0
7.2




550 80 24.03
53
4

6.8





67 22.80
54
4

6.6




567 75 22.67
55
3.5

7.0





61 22.99
56
3.5

7.0





85 23.80
57
3.5

7.0





87 23.87
58 Before 3 2 20 6.8 400 35 0.25 0.5 0.5 660 90 23.57 UV
59
0.5 2 40 7.0


0 0.1
88 23.91 UV
60
0.5 2 40 7.0





88 23.91 UV
61
0.25 0 40 7.0





85 23.80 UV
62
0 0 40 7.0





76 23.50 UV

TAN= Total Ammonia Nitrogen (i.e. NH3 + NH4)
TDS = Total Dissolved Solids
ORP = Oxidation Reduction Potential
rH = Relative Hydrogen Score

Here's what it looks like

29 Gallon tank on day 57


What it might mean...

I started this tank very slowly, very deliberately, and the experience is suggestive of one thing in particular: First hand confirmation that plants do in fact compete with the filter for nutrients, which may have caused the slow cycling and the ammonia build-up. Carl Strohmeyer of AAP also came to that conclusion on the forum Everything Aquatic, when I shared my results there. But, as you can also see, eventually, once the nitrification cycle set in, things went pretty fast, and now I have a healthy tank, so my main takeaway is that both the nitrogen cycle is indeed more complex and less linear than we once thought, but mostly, the usual estimates of 4-6 weeks are misleading, it can be at least two months. As I publish this, it's day 62, and my ammonia and nitrite are 0, so nitrate, more plants, and water changes are the main worry now.

At first I had only the potted Wisteria, which had some gravel from the old tank that it came from, with the deliberate purpose of bringing in some bacteria culture from the old tank, but not too many plants, but by week three I brought in the two Amazon plants.

Diana Walstad, in her book The Ecology of the Planted Aquarium takes the view that a natural aquarium is one in which the balance between the plants and the fish is kept without any artificial filtration. That is one line of thought, and perfectly viable, but it is not where I want to be. It amounts in effect to the creation of an extremely small pond, whereas the addition of  power filters creates a simulation of a larger body of water, with more biological capacity, and I do not see anything wrong in that. I still feel that the plants to me are as important as the fish, but I like the luxury of adding some more fish.

However, the experience with starting this aquarium may indeed suggest that you might be better off starting the filter first and perhaps doing the deliberate cycling with ammonia before you ever add fish or plants, so that the filter is solidly started up before you ever introduce any plants or fish. I would still prefer to get the plants settled before the fish, even though I won't have species that attack the plants.  

Right now, I am going to continue with just five amano shrimp, and 4 pygmy cories, and I will be adding more plants and do another invert invasion soon. And I am watching my water parameters like a hawk, and in active dialog on the Everythng Aquatic forum.